Banksy directs “Simpsons” couch gag

The most recent Simpsons episode had a couch gag that was a little different than usual. It was directed by british artist Banksy, who’s known for his strong views on the society turning a blind eye to a lot of mistreating going on. This time it was the simpsons being an evil corporation (or their merchandise to be precise) while lots of factory workers were treated like machines. This is of course true with most modern products (see apple’s factories in China and the suicides there) but the Simpsons’ producers have balls of steel to put something like this up. Good!

when redesigns kill the project / how people get used to things

We’ve seen it a couple of times already. Facebook made some changes and groups started popping up that were hoping to get the new design back. Some even issued threats that they’ll stop using the service if it’s not reverted tom the beloved original.

That clearly defines how people hate a change. Why blame them? It’s confusing when you come back to a familiar site to see it changed. As with music – you like what you already know- if you’ve used a site for a long time and see it many, many times you get used to the design of it as well. And it doesn’t really matter if the design was good or bad. It was “home sweet home” and people don’t like others redecorating their home. Now do they?

The whole subject came up because just recently some statistic were revealed about the popular site Digg. They had a steady 40mil uu daily and they drastically redesign the site. The result? a 26% decline in a few weeks in the US. That’s a lot of users.

So what’s the solution if you don’t want to stay behind with your design but you don’t want your viewers to go away? The simplest solution would be to keep changing small stuff constantly so people don’t have the time to get used. And if you keep the changes small the evolution will be easier to grasp than a revolution.

Examples? Think Google.

Business campaigns online on low budget

I have stumbled recently across some ideas on how to enhance a traditionally (tv / radio) marketed campaign (of an event this time, not a product) by adding some internet presence but at low cost. So where should a marketer start with such a daunting task?

Well first and foremost it’s important to know your target group and which online places do they prefer. For example some countries don’t use twitter as much as others, while some have their own facebook/myspace alternative and the big two (well big one to be honest) are not as present there. But once we sort of get the idea of where to start the next question arises.

What’s next?

Is the next step adding marketing babble advertising media everywhere and waiting for our fish to catch bait?
(remembering that we’re on a budget – preferably no money, and the smaller amount we have to spend the better). So where do we start? First let’s focus on the event we’d like to promote. And since nothing nowadays is truly original we can find similar events in the past. And even if not and this is truly an unique thing we can find categories in which our event fits – like cooking / vegetarian / concerts. By narrowing it down to a couple of tags we need to start at the bottom first, because the top will be much easier. So let’s say we have those three tags and want to promote a big concert in our town of 2 mil. citizens, which is of course already promoted on the radio, press and tv.

Starting at the bottom

By starting at the bottom I mean preparing a short, friendly notice (not a marketing ad), with a couple of pictures and generally a visually pleasant form. This is important because in most cases like that plain text will be skipped.
Then we go blog hunting. We find at least 10 (50 is better) blogs that relate to at least one of our subjects and have a viewer base that’s large enough to cover our city too (even if the blogger is from some other place in the same country). Then we write to them, trying to sound as “real” as possible. Saying “Hello” at the beginning won’t hurt (yeah it’s obvious but skipped so often it makes my blood freeze). Then let’s tell them how we found them, and that we think we have some interesting info to share with them. And then the info part comes in, but it seriously should be presented like you’re describing it to a friend you stumbled upon on a street. No fancy big words, no marketing bullshit. Plain and simple. And good looking visually (photos speak!)

Moving to the top

A facebook group or page is the typical next answer and it’s also the right one. Try and fill it out with as much detail as possible but DON’T FORGET THE PHOTOS. Any promotional visual material is crucial. A nice poster. Or even internet posters with a nice photo and some basic even info on it. Post it, share it. Write there from time to time. The best way to actually get somewhere is by running a facebook ad, which in fact are pretty cheap. You can end up paying less than $1 per 1000 views of your ad and this is A LOT! Try and experiment with those.

Twitter is also a fun way to be more socially “open” to your followers (but you need to have some already) because you can communicate even more like a real person with them. Short, direct messages and remember to post something that’s only touching your subject indirectly like a funny video of someone else’s vegetarian activist concert with guys dressed as giant culiflowers or whatever. Be real and human.

Same goes with a youtube channel – get as many videos of your performers or even recipes online, tag them correctly and have each point to either your website or your facebook / twitter. It won’t hurt to make a splash screen with the most important info and put it INSIDE the videos at their beginning and end so they won’t be missed.

And remember. Be a human. Because being a robot, or worse – a marketing guy – won’t buy you trust. And won’t buy you followers.

Youtube is 5 years old!

youtubetimeline

5 years. And yet it seems it had been there forever, right? Well apparently 5 years ago if you wanted to watch an online video you had to download a crappy MPG file or wait for those quicktimes to stream. And then along came two guys and their garage, and they changed the web forever. Without them we wouldn’t have the amazed lemur, the skateboarding dog, the laughing baby and many other classics of web 2.0 entertainment. Happy birthday Youtube! Too see (among other things) the Youtube timeline click on the number 5 next to their logo.

Internet Explorer web share is shrinking

browsers
According to a recent survey by “Net Applications” this is the first time in 10 years when IE had less than 60% of market share. This is of course a good trend since this browser is obsolete, buggy and doesn’t follow the standards. Plus it’s hard to make cross-browser sites look the same and it’s usually IE’s fault. The fastest growing is actually Google Chrome which might in fact overpower firefox in a few years. That is all good news, even though microsoft is working on HTML5 supporting IE9, they’ll probably be at 50% in two years.

Exciting changes ahead for the web and publishing alike

tabletready

Say what?

Palm had just been bought by HP. What does that mean? Actually a lot. Right now we have to major players in the tablet area – apple and google with their android based tablets. Palm has experience with mobile devices and a great mobile OS – HP has money and marketing. This means that the era of the tablet has officially started. And this will be the next step in computing, web and print.

Changes coming

That basically means that in the precise moment of market saturation with these devices there will be a point in which some publication will receive more “hits” through slate devices than through normal print. Then we will know it has started. And if it starts it will also change the web into a more “handy” interface with bigger elements and touch / swipe enabled controls.

So maybe it’s time to get ahead of the curve and try to create new experiences that are “tablet-ready”? You think it’ll be a marker like “HD ready” was some years back?

How much is a facebook fan worth? 30 cents!

facebookandmoney

Social media marketing platform company Vitrue has determined that the average value of a Facebook ?fan? is about $3.60 in equivalent media each year. This calculation is based on having one million Fan Page fans, and is not weighted for brand recognition.

Ok but what does that actually mean? First let’s try and see how did they get that number.

Let’s add it up

A company posting twice a day and having a million fans will get 60 million impressions every month. Vitrue used $5 CPM (which is a cost for a thousand impressions) and 60M impressions ended up being $300,000 per month of media value. That means that for the same amount of views the company would’ve paid that much in other media. That 300,000 is a monthly value, so per year it’d be somewhere close to 3,6 Million dollars. Dividing that by a million “Fans” we get $3,6. Is that right? Does it really work that way?

Let’s break it down

Posting twice a day for a month? 60 posts in a month? Can you imagine still being a fan of a company after you’ve been bombarded by information about them twice a day for a month? A year? Would anyone “stay as a fan” in that case? And what would they inform us about? In most cases we’d be done with all of the company’s products in a few days or weeks. So what’s next? “Buy buy buy” statuses? Sure we can say that if you put all of the oceans water in a small tube, the length of the tube would be REALLY F***ING BIG. Right?

The real number anyone?

So how many posts a month are we talking about to maintain a brand awareness and not loose the fans? I’m thinking 5 posts per month would be the right number. That would be almost 1 post per week so our “fans” won’t have their status feeds flooded, and yet they will notice us. So what do the numbers tell us in such a case? Let’s assume that we do have a million fans. So we get 5 million impressions. That is $25,000 per month. So in a year it’ll be $300,000 and thus the value of one facebook fan per year is $0,3. Which is 30 cents. And that seems a lot more natural than $3,6. Right?

Fold ’em when you need ’em

What is the mysterious “fold” ?

There’s this very big issue among many designers of making all the necessary information above the fold (that being a standard of about 600 / 700 pixels high). So they try and they try to fit everything that’s “important” in there. In a typical layout that gives us 960 x 660 pixels of space that the most users will instantly see. Which is about this much of this website :
cm-960x660

Continue reading

Types of viral videos

typesofviral

A brief recognition of the types of viral videos floating around the web with selected, recent examples.

First type is the “Your face here” viral video, spread most recently (after the stupid dancing elves) by a swedish “our hero” campaign.
Now this is very well made and it shows that a lot of money was put into the production of this viral, and that’s one of the reasons it’s so successful – it seems “real” when you see your own face on all those pictures inside the video. The technology makes it believable and that counts! Here’s the link : Great swedish Viral

The other type is the funky “Whoa! They did a great job” type of regular ads, that don’t try to pretend they’re not an ad. Instead they are so creative and innovative + just plain “new” that people send them out and about anyway. Here’s the most recent “Google Chrome ad video” :

Yet another type is “we know it’s an Ad for a respectable company, but look how stupid it is” and here we have a winner in form of the MSI slim laptops and showing they’re so thin you can catch one with your butt. Most consumers will probably think : Hey , are they showing us where their laptops belong? But all in all it does spread anyway. Here’s a preview :

Then there are those “not yet used ideas” like the guys jumping into pants. The pants are not branded (yet, cause I’m sure the idea will be bought by some major jeans company sooner or later). They did it as a trick and to show their skills, but the marketing value of it is pretty big if used properly. Here’s the video:
Update : I’ve heard that the idea was made into a commercial later on. 5 million youtube views does account for something.

Then there’s the lipdub (just type lip dub in youtube search and you’ll get millions of videos) but that’s not really a comercial thing that much. There are also weird, funny and / or stupid songs videos. The proud winner in that category is microsoft songsmith – which went viral in seconds after the release of the video. The song is so terrible that it spreads unbelievably fast. Oh and they use a mac during the video ;)

Update: And finally, almost forgot about it, there’s the wacky science, represented by mentos + diet coke “experiments”. Don’t forget your lab coats for such videos, that makes them more believable. ;)

But truly anything can be viral, not necessarily commercial in value. Any more ideas?